New York Times: U.S. Racing Toward Debt ‘Shock’

Monday, November 23, 2009 1:51 PM

A page one, top-of-the-fold New York Times report Monday warns that U.S. debt is rising so fast that the federal government is careening toward a “payment shock” in the not-too-distant future.

The Times lead headline read: “Federal Government Faces Balloon in Debt Payments: At $700 Billion a Year, Cost Will Top Budgets for 2 Wars, Education, Energy.”

The Times headline appears eerie just as the Senate moves to push forward on a radical healthcare reform — with CBO estimates for a final bill costing nearly $1 trillion dollars over the next year.

The national debt now stands at over $12 trillion and the White House estimates that the cost of servicing the debt will rise to more than $700 billion a year in 2019, up from $202 billion this year. The Times suggests that $700 billion annual payment cost may be conservative.

The additional $500 billion a year in interest payments would surpass the combined budgets this year for education, energy, homeland security, plus the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Times observes.

Treasury officials face not only huge new debts incurred in response to the economic meltdown but a balloon of short-term borrowings coming due in the months ahead, and interest rates that are certain to return to normal levels when the Federal Reserve concludes that the fiscal emergency has passed.

“Even as Treasury officials are racing to lock in today’s low rates by exchanging short-term borrowings for long-term bonds, the government faces a payment shock similar to those that sent legions of overstretched homeowners into default on their mortgages,” The Times reported on Monday.

http://moneynews.newsmax.com/headlines/nyt_us_debt_shock/2009/11/23/289782.html?s=al&promo_code=91C9-1

Economy Continues To Slow – 6.3% Decrease Reported

Economy dips at slightly faster 6.3 percent pace

WASHINGTON – The economy shrank at a 6.3 percent pace at the end of 2008, the worst showing in a quarter-century, and probably isn’t doing much better now.

The Commerce Department on Thursday reported that the economy was sinking a bit faster than the 6.2 percent annualized drop for the October-December quarter estimated a month ago.

And the pain has persisted in the current quarter. New claims for unemployment benefits last week rose to a seasonally adjusted 652,000 from the previous week’s revised figure of 644,000, the Labor Department said Thursday. The total number of people claiming benefits jumped to 5.56 million, higher than economists’ projections of 5.48 million, and a ninth straight record-high. [SEE: Unemployment claims rise to 40-year high; retail sales drop – http://www.lowellsun.com/business/ci_11904696 ]

The figures indicate the labor market remains weak even as some other economic indicators come in better than expected.

Consumers are cutting back under the weight of rising unemployment, falling home values and shrinking investment portfolios. Those factors have forced companies to slash production and jobs. All the negative forces are feeding on each other in a vicious cycle that has deepened the recession, now in its second year.

Economists were bracing for an even sharper 6.5 percent annualized decline in the government’s third and final estimate of gross domestic product for the fourth quarter.

Still, the results were dismal. The economy started off 2008 on feeble footing, picked up a bit of speed in the spring and then contracted at an annualized rate of 0.5 percent in the third quarter.

The faster downhill slide in the final quarter came as the financial crisis — the worst since the 1930s — intensified.

The main culprit behind the GDP downgrade was that businesses’ cut inventories more deeply than estimated a month ago. That shaved 0.11 percentage points off fourth-quarter GDP, rather than adding 0.16 percentage points in the previous report.

Builders also cut spending on commercial construction more deeply through previously thought.

Many analysts believe the economy will keep shrinking at least through the first six months of this year.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090326/ap_on_bi_go_ec_fi/economy

This last comment is the key. The recession may now be in it’s 16th month. History teaches us that the “recovery cycle” will begin in the next 3 to 6 months – without any Government intervention or the incredible spending presently scheduled by the Government. The inevitable increase in taxes, to pay for the spending, and the equally inevitable increase in interest rates associated with massive Government borrowing are, or should be, the real worry. Higher taxes and higher interest rates may act to stall or reverse the normal recovery “cycle”.  

The earliest of  the Government’s “scheduled” spending will not  be infused into the economy for 36 to 48 months. Most of  the “scheduled” spending won’t even take place for 36 to 48 months. 

03/25/09   –  A $34.0 billion auction of five-year Treasury notes drew lighter demand than recent offerings, and may have jogged concerns that foreign buyers could lose their appetite for purchasing U.S. debt.  http://www.forbes.com/2009/03/25/briefing-americas-afternoon-markets-economy-treasury.html?partner=yahootix

Jobless rate bolts to high not seen since Clinton Administration – Unemployment 14 year high of 6.5 percent

UPDATED HERE: https://mcauleysworld.wordpress.com/2009/09/05/unemployment-and-1st-time-unemployment-claims-are-on-the-rise/

Jobless rate bolts to 14-year high of 6.5 percent

By JEANNINE AVERSA, AP Economics Writer

WASHINGTON – The nation’s unemployment rate bolted to a 14-year high of 6.5 percent in October as another 240,000 jobs were cut, far worse than economists expected and stark proof the economy is deteriorating at an alarmingly rapid pace.

The new snapshot, released Friday by the Labor Department, showed the crucial jobs market quickly eroding. The jobless rate zoomed to 6.5 percent in October from 6.1 percent in September.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081107/ap_on_bi_go_ec_fi/economy

Let me see, 14 years ago. That would be 1994. The middle of Clinton’s first term. A Democratic Congress then and a Democratic Congress now – getting more liberal by the minute.

I thought the Clinton days were the days of “Milk & Honey” – things don’t get better than that.

Well, that is true compared with the Carter Administration days – where we seem to be headed.

The current (2008) “Prime Interest Rate”  – 4%                 http://www.bankrate.com/brm/ratewatch/leading-rates.asp

Under Jimmy Carter Interest rates topped out at 21.5% in Decemeber 1980, 5 times higher than today.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Carter

2008 Unemployment Rate: (4.9% January 2008 – 6.5 % October 2008) 2008 Average – 5.52% http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServletdata_tool=latest_numbers&series_id=LNS14000000

Under Jimmy Carter unemployment topped out at a whopping, double digit  – 11.3% – in some states. Twice as high as the 2008 National Average.

http://www.deptofnumbers.com/unemployment/michigan/

The 2008 average inflation rate 4.3%. http://inflationdata.com/inflation/inflation_rate/CurrentInflation.asp

Under Jimmy Carter – 14% inflation. 

http://economics.about.com/od/useconomichistory/a/stagflation.htm

One last comparison, “The media discovered and promoted Carter. As Lawrence Shoup noted in his 1980 book The Carter Presidency and Beyond:

“What Carter had that his opponents did not was the acceptance and support of elite sectors of the mass communications media. It was their favorable coverage of Carter and his campaign that gave him an edge, propelling him rocket-like to the top of the opinion polls. This helped Carter win key primary election victories, enabling him to rise from an obscure public figure to President-elect in the short space of 9 months.”  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Carter

%d bloggers like this: