Homeland Security Secretary Napolitano dodges questions from U.S. Senate while delaying implementation of “the Anti-Border Corruption Act”

Sen. Mark Pryor (D-Ark.) may be getting tired of prodding Department of Homeland Secretary Janet Napolitano. He’s been dealing with her bureaucracy since spring on the issue of Mexican border security.
On Thursday, Pryor nudged again. [This issue is deadly serious, however, Pryor’s concern is purely political. After two years the Obama Administration continues on a reckless of course of “open borders” and “selective law enforcement”. The question is why has the Senate not acted …. the Country needs more than “gentle” political “nudges” that fo nothing more than provide political cover to the man in charge of Homeland Security Oversight]
As chairman of a subcommittee of the Department of Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, Pryor sent Napolitano a letter requesting she answer a series of questions surrounding corruption of U.S. Custom and Border Protection (CBP) agents.
In July, the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee passed Pryor’s legislation, the Anti-Border Corruption Act, to help prevent rogue border agents from being hired or retained. It requires the Custom and Border Protection agency to give polygraph tests to all applicants for law enforcement positions. The requirement has to be implemented within two years, providing the agency time to hire and train examiners. The bill also requires the agency to initiate background checks on all backlogged employees within six months.

In an April letter to a group of senators that included Pryor, Napolitano wrote: “We are engaged in a thorough review of the issues raised . . . and a long-term solution to ensure that we root out corruption and effectively prosecute those who threaten our country.”

She added, “We are also assessing our integrity policies to ensure they include adequate background and checks on CPB employees.”

The Department of Homeland Security did not return phone calls Thursday about Pryor’s new letter to Napolitano.

Internal corruption cases have escalated in recent years. Since 2003, there have been 129 corruption arrests of CBP officers. Last year, there were 576 allegations of corruption. Many centered on drug smuggling.
In his letter to Napolitano, Pryor cited that President Obama signed a bill into law on Aug. 13 that would provide emergency supplemental appropriations to hire more border security agents.
“In that vein, I remain concerned about the failure to conduct polygraphs on new hires, as well as the growing periodic reinvestigations backlog,” Pryor wrote.
He wants Napolitano to clarify the link between the background check measures and the current investigations by Sept. 21. Pryor’s is the sole signature on the letter.
“As we increase the number of agents patrolling our borders, we need to be confident that these men and women have been thoroughly screened and are fully committed to protecting our country,” Pryor told Politics Daily. “If we don’t seal the cracks in our hiring process now, we risk wasting taxpayer dollars and creating a false sense of security.”

Border Corruption: Drugs Now, Dirty Bombs Next?

While there are many complicated problems along the U.S.-Mexico border, one piece of the puzzling crisis is corruption.

Sadly, Mexican drug cartels are corrupting U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents at startling rates.

Internal corruption cases have escalated in recent years. Since 2003, there have been 129 corruption arrests of CBP officers. Last year, there were 576 allegations of corruption.

A recent hearing by the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Ad Hoc Subcommittee on State, Local and Private Sector Preparedness and Integration highlighted the issue.

One person gained employment as a border inspector specifically to smuggle drugs. The person imported more than 1,000 kilograms of marijuana to the United States and received more than $5 million in bribe payments. He pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy.

Another case included two CBP officers in Brownsville, Texas, who assisted an illegal-immigrant and narcotics-smuggling organization. A search of one of the officer’s houses yielded $85,250 in cash.

The main reason for such cases? Failure to properly screen potential employees.

Such dangerous cracks in the agent-screening process concern Sen. Mark Pryor (D-Ark.), chairman of the subcommittee. He says it allows drug cartels to infiltrate this country’s law enforcement. Pryor has introduced legislation — the Anti-Border Corruption Act — to curb such crime.

“We need to clamp down on this now,” Pryor said. “By my estimates, it is already out of control, but it’s really about to get out of control if we’re not careful.”

The legislation includes a more rigorous system of polygraph testing. Pryor’s bill would require such tests of all applicants for law enforcement positions.

During the March hearing, which Pryor was the only senator to attend, CBP officials said that fewer than 15 percent of job applicants receive a polygraph test, even though standing policy states everyone should be examined. Sixty percent of those who do receive a polygraph test are deemed not suitable for hiring. “These tests are a critical part of the screening process to weed out bad apples,” Pryor said.

Every five years CBP employees are required to undergo a background check. Currently, there is a backlog of 10,000 cases. That number will nearly double by year’s end. Pryor’s legislation would require the CBP to eliminate the current employee background check backlog within six months.

The problem isn’t just polygraph tests, however. Pryor says there should be drastically improved coordination between the Department of Homeland Security and other federal agencies. DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano has received a letter from the Senate stating that the Senate wants better sharing of information and prevention of duplicative investigations. They cited a memo dated Dec. 16, 2009, from the DHS Inspector General’s office that claimed jurisdiction over corruption investigations currently being carried out by the Customs and Border Protection Internal Affairs.

“My message to DHS is clear: either fix your problems voluntarily, or I will make sure you do it by law,” Pryor said.

If Napolitano doesn’t address the issue, Pryor said he will move to put the bill into law because border security is a national security issue. Today, drug smuggling, he says; tomorrow, dirty bombs.

http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/04/28/border-corruption-drugs-now-dirty-bombs-next/

Homeland Security’s Secret Report on Right Wing Extremists – Full Report

Original Report Can Be Viewed Here: http://wnd.com/images/dhs-rightwing-extremism.pdf – Until it is removed

The WORD PRESS editing function stinks – I’ll try to correct this again later today …………

(U//FOUO) Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment

UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

 

(U)

 

This product contains Law Enforcement Sensitive (LES) information. No portion of the LES information

 

 

should be released to the media, the general public, or over non-secure Internet servers. Release of this information could adversely affect or jeopardize

investigative activities. (U)

 

This document is UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (U//FOUO). It contains information that may be exempt from public release under the

 

 

Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552). It is to be controlled, stored, handled, transmitted, distributed, and disposed of in accordance with DHS policy relating to

FOUO information and is not to be released to the public, the media, or other personnel who do not have a valid need-to-know without prior approval of an authorized

DHS official. State and local homeland security officials may share this document with authorized security personnel without further approval from DHS.

(U) All U.S. person information has been minimized. Should you require the minimized U.S. person information, please contact the DHS/I&A Production Branch at

IA.PM@hq.dhs.gov, IA.PM@dhs.sgov.gov, or IA.PM@dhs.ic.gov.

 

 

Economic and Political Climate Fueling

Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment

 

 

 

7 April 2009

 

 

 

Warning: LAW ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION NOTICE: (U//FOUO) Rightwing Extremism: Current

(U) Prepared by the Extremism and Radicalization Branch, Homeland Environment Threat Analysis

Division. Coordinated with the FBI.

 

 

 

(U) Scope

 

 

 

(U//FOUO) This product is one of a series of intelligence assessments published by the

Extremism and Radicalization Branch to facilitate a greater understanding of the

phenomenon of violent radicalization in the United States. The information is

provided to federal, state, local, and tribal counterterrorism and law enforcement

officials so they may effectively deter, prevent, preempt, or respond to terrorist attacks

against the United States. Federal efforts to influence domestic public opinion must be

conducted in an overt and transparent manner, clearly identifying United States

Government sponsorship.

 

UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

 

 

 

 information that domestic rightwing

terrorists are currently planning acts of violence,

 

 

but rightwing extremists may be gaining new recruits by playing on their fears about

several emergent issues. The economic downturn and the election of the first

African American president present unique drivers for rightwing radicalization and

recruitment.

 

 

 

during 2009 have been largely rhetorical and have not indicated plans to carry

out violent acts. Nevertheless, the consequences of a prolonged economic

downturn—including real estate foreclosures, unemployment, and an inability

to obtain credit—could create a fertile recruiting environment for rightwing

extremists and even result in confrontations between such groups and

government authorities similar to those in the past.

 

 

 

African American president, and are focusing their efforts to recruit new

members, mobilize existing supporters, and broaden their scope and appeal

through propaganda, but they have not yet turned to attack planning.

(U//FOUO) The current economic and political climate has some similarities to the

1990s when rightwing extremism experienced a resurgence fueled largely by an

economic recession, criticism about the outsourcing of jobs, and the perceived threat to

U.S. power and sovereignty by other foreign powers.

 

 

 

number of domestic rightwing terrorist and extremist groups and an increase in

violent acts targeting government facilities, law enforcement officers, banks,

and infrastructure sectors.

 

 

 

government scrutiny as a result of the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing and

disrupted plots, improvements in the economy, and the continued U.S. standing

as the preeminent world power.

(U//FOUO) The possible passage of new restrictions on firearms and the return of

military veterans facing significant challenges reintegrating into their communities

could lead to the potential emergence of terrorist groups or lone wolf extremists

capable of carrying out violent attacks.

 

 

 

adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups),

and those that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or

rejecting government authority entirely. It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a

single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration.

 

UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

 

 

 

 

likely would attract new members into the ranks of rightwing extremist groups,

as well as potentially spur some of them to begin planning and training for

violence against the government. The high volume of purchases and

stockpiling of weapons and ammunition by rightwing extremists in anticipation

of restrictions and bans in some parts of the country continue to be a primary

concern to law enforcement.

 

 

 

attractive to rightwing extremists. DHS/I&A is concerned that rightwing

extremists will attempt to recruit and radicalize returning veterans in order to

boost their violent capabilities.

 

 

driving a resurgence in rightwing extremist recruitment and radicalization activity.

Despite similarities to the climate of the 1990s, the threat posed by lone wolves and small

terrorist cells is more pronounced than in past years. In addition, the historical election of

an African American president and the prospect of policy changes are proving to be a

driving force for rightwing extremist recruitment and radicalization.

— (U) A recent example of the potential violence associated with a rise in rightwing

extremism may be found in the shooting deaths of three police officers in

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, on 4 April 2009. The alleged gunman’s reaction

reportedly was influenced by his racist ideology and belief in antigovernment

conspiracy theories related to gun confiscations, citizen detention camps, and a

Jewish-controlled “one world government.”

 

 

economy, the perceived loss of U.S. jobs in the manufacturing and construction sectors,

and home foreclosures. Anti-Semitic extremists attribute these losses to a deliberate

conspiracy conducted by a cabal of Jewish “financial elites.” These “accusatory” tactics

are employed to draw new recruits into rightwing extremist groups and further radicalize

those already subscribing to extremist beliefs. DHS/I&A assesses this trend is likely to

accelerate if the economy is perceived to worsen.

 

 

tool. Many rightwing extremists are antagonistic toward the new presidential

administration and its perceived stance on a range of issues, including immigration and

citizenship, the expansion of social programs to minorities, and restrictions on firearms

 

UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

 

 

(U//FOUO) Scholars and experts disagree over poverty’s role in motivating violent radicalization orownership and use. Rightwing extremists are increasingly galvanized by these concerns(U) Revisiting the 1990s(U//FOUO) Paralleling the current national climate, rightwing extremists during the(U) Economic Hardship and Extremism(U//FOUO) Historically, domestic rightwing extremists have feared, predicted, andUNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYPage 5 of 9(U) Illegal Immigration(U//FOUO) Rightwing extremists were concerned during the 1990s with the perception(U//FOUO) Many rightwing extremist groups perceive recent gun control legislation as aUNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYPage 6 of 9District of  Columbia v. Hellerin which the Court reaffirmed an individual’s right to keep and bear

(U) Legislative and Judicial Drivers

 

threat to their right to bear arms and in response have increased weapons and ammunition

stockpiling, as well as renewed participation in paramilitary training exercises. Such

activity, combined with a heightened level of extremist paranoia, has the potential to

facilitate criminal activity and violence.

— (U//FOUO) During the 1990s, rightwing extremist hostility toward government

was fueled by the implementation of restrictive gun laws—such as the Brady Law

that established a 5-day waiting period prior to purchasing a handgun and the

1994 Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act that limited the sale of

various types of assault rifles—and federal law enforcement’s handling of the

confrontations at Waco, Texas and Ruby Ridge, Idaho.

 

UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

 

— (U//FOUO) On the current front, legislation has been proposed this year

requiring mandatory registration of all firearms in the United States. Similar

legislation was introduced in 2008 in several states proposing mandatory tagging

and registration of ammunition. It is unclear if either bill will be passed into law;

nonetheless, a correlation may exist between the potential passage of gun control

legislation and increased hoarding of ammunition, weapons stockpiling, and

paramilitary training activities among rightwing extremists.

(U//FOUO) Open source reporting of wartime ammunition shortages has likely spurred

rightwing extremists—as well as law-abiding Americans—to make bulk purchases of

ammunition. These shortages have increased the cost of ammunition, further

exacerbating rightwing extremist paranoia and leading to further stockpiling activity.

Both rightwing extremists and law-abiding citizens share a belief that rising crime rates

attributed to a slumping economy make the purchase of legitimate firearms a wise move

at this time.

(U//FOUO) Weapons rights and gun-control legislation are likely to be hotly contested

subjects of political debate in light of the 2008 Supreme Court’s decision in

 

 

 

 

arms under the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, but left open to debate the

precise contours of that right. Because debates over constitutional rights are intense, and

parties on all sides have deeply held, sincere, but vastly divergent beliefs, violent

extremists may attempt to co-opt the debate and use the controversy as a radicalization

tool.

 

 

magnified in the event of an economic crisis or military confrontation, harkening back to

the “New World Order” conspiracy theories of the 1990s. The dissolution of Communist

countries in Eastern Europe and the end of the Soviet Union in the 1990s led some

rightwing extremists to believe that a “New World Order” would bring about a world

government that would usurp the sovereignty of the United States and its Constitution,

thus infringing upon their liberty. The dynamics in 2009 are somewhat similar, as other

countries, including China, India, and Russia, as well as some smaller, oil-producing

states, are experiencing a rise in economic power and influence.

— (U//FOUO) Fear of Communist regimes and related conspiracy theories

characterizing the U.S. Government’s role as either complicit in a foreign

invasion or acquiescing as part of a “One World Government” plan inspired

extremist members of the militia movement to target government and military

facilities in past years.

— (U//FOUO) Law enforcement in 1996 arrested three rightwing militia members

in Battle Creek, Michigan with pipe bombs, automatic weapons, and military

 

UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

 

 

small terrorist cells embracing violent rightwingordnance that they planned to use in attacks on nearby military and federal(U) Disgruntled Military Veterans(U//FOUO) DHS/I&A assesses that rightwing extremists will attempt to recruit andUNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYPage 8 of 9(U) Outlook(U//FOUO) DHS/I&A assesses that the combination of environmental factors that echoUNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYFOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

extremist ideology are the most dangerous domestic terrorism threat in the United States. Information

from law enforcement and nongovernmental organizations indicates lone wolves and small terrorist

cells have shown intent—and, in some cases, the capability—to commit violent acts.

— (U//LES) DHS/I&A has concluded that white supremacist lone wolves pose the most

significant domestic terrorist threat because of their low profile and autonomy—separate from

any formalized group—which hampers warning efforts.

— (U//FOUO) Similarly, recent state and municipal law enforcement reporting has warned of the

dangers of rightwing extremists embracing the tactics of “leaderless resistance” and of lone

wolves carrying out acts of violence.

— (U//FOUO) Arrests in the past several years of radical militia members in Alabama, Arkansas,

and Pennsylvania on firearms, explosives, and other related violations indicates the emergence

of small, well-armed extremist groups in some rural areas.

 

facilities and infrastructure targets.

— (U//FOUO) Rightwing extremist views bemoan the decline of U.S. stature and

have recently focused on themes such as the loss of U.S. manufacturing capability

to China and India, Russia’s control of energy resources and use of these to

pressure other countries, and China’s investment in U.S. real estate and

corporations as a part of subversion strategy.

 

 

radicalize returning veterans in order to exploit their skills and knowledge derived from

military training and combat. These skills and knowledge have the potential to boost the

capabilities of extremists—including lone wolves or small terrorist cells—to carry out

violence. The willingness of a small percentage of military personnel to join extremist

groups during the 1990s because they were disgruntled, disillusioned, or suffering from

the psychological effects of war is being replicated today.

— (U) After Operation Desert Shield/Storm in 1990-1991, some returning military

veterans—including Timothy McVeigh—joined or associated with rightwing

extremist groups.

— (U) A prominent civil rights organization reported in 2006 that “large numbers

of potentially violent neo-Nazis, skinheads, and other white supremacists are now

learning the art of warfare in the [U.S.] armed forces.”

— (U//LES) The FBI noted in a 2008 report on the white supremacist movement

that some returning military veterans from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have

joined extremist groups.

 

UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

 

 

 

the 1990s, including heightened interest in legislation for tighter firearms restrictions and

returning military veterans, as well as several new trends, including an uncertain

economy and a perceived rising influence of other countries, may be invigorating

rightwing extremist activity, specifically the white supremacist and militia movements.

To the extent that these factors persist, rightwing extremism is likely to grow in strength.

(U//FOUO) Unlike the earlier period, the advent of the Internet and other informationage

technologies since the 1990s has given domestic extremists greater access to

information related to bomb-making, weapons training, and tactics, as well as targeting of

individuals, organizations, and facilities, potentially making extremist individuals and

groups more dangerous and the consequences of their violence more severe. New

technologies also permit domestic extremists to send and receive encrypted

communications and to network with other extremists throughout the country and abroad,

making it much more difficult for law enforcement to deter, prevent, or preempt a violent

extremist attack.

(U//FOUO) A number of law enforcement actions and external factors were effective in

limiting the militia movement during the 1990s and could be utilized in today’s climate.

— (U//FOUO) Following the 1995 bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah federal

building in Oklahoma City, the militia movement declined in total membership

and in the number of organized groups because many members distanced

themselves from the movement as a result of the intense scrutiny militias received

after the bombing.

— (U//FOUO) Militia membership continued to decline after the turn of the

millennium as a result of law enforcement disruptions of multiple terrorist plots

linked to violent rightwing extremists, new legislation banning paramilitary

training, and militia frustration that the “revolution” never materialized.

— (U//FOUO) Although the U.S. economy experienced a significant recovery and

many perceived a concomitant rise in U.S. standing in the world, white

supremacist groups continued to experience slight growth.

(U//FOUO) DHS/I&A will be working with its state and local partners over the next

several months to ascertain with greater regional specificity the rise in rightwing

extremist activity in the United States, with a particular emphasis on the political,

economic, and social factors that drive rightwing extremist radicalization.

 

UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Page 9 of 9

 

 

terrorist activity. High unemployment, however, has the potential to lead to alienation, thus increasing

an individual’s susceptibility to extremist ideas. According to a 2007 study from the German Institute

for Economic Research, there appears to be a strong association between a parent’s unemployment

status and the formation of rightwing extremist beliefs in their children—specifically xenophobia and

antidemocratic ideals.

and leverage them as drivers for recruitment. From the 2008 election timeframe to the

present, rightwing extremists have capitalized on related racial and political prejudices in

expanded propaganda campaigns, thereby reaching out to a wider audience of potential

sympathizers.

— (U//LES) Most statements by rightwing extremists have been rhetorical,

expressing concerns about the election of the first African American president,

but stopping short of calls for violent action. In two instances in the run-up to the

election, extremists appeared to be in the early planning stages of some

threatening activity targeting the Democratic nominee, but law enforcement

interceded.

 

 

1990s exploited a variety of social issues and political themes to increase group visibility

and recruit new members. Prominent among these themes were the militia movement’s

opposition to gun control efforts, criticism of free trade agreements (particularly those

with Mexico), and highlighting perceived government infringement on civil liberties as

well as white supremacists’ longstanding exploitation of social issues such as abortion,

inter-racial crimes, and same-sex marriage. During the 1990s, these issues contributed to

the growth in the number of domestic rightwing terrorist and extremist groups and an

increase in violent acts targeting government facilities, law enforcement officers, banks,

and infrastructure sectors.

 

 

anticipated a cataclysmic economic collapse in the United States. Prominent

antigovernment conspiracy theorists have incorporated aspects of an impending

economic collapse to intensify fear and paranoia among like-minded individuals and to

attract recruits during times of economic uncertainty. Conspiracy theories involving

declarations of martial law, impending civil strife or racial conflict, suspension of the

U.S. Constitution, and the creation of citizen detention camps often incorporate aspects of

a failed economy. Antigovernment conspiracy theories and “end times” prophecies could

motivate extremist individuals and groups to stockpile food, ammunition, and weapons.

These teachings also have been linked with the radicalization of domestic extremist

individuals and groups in the past, such as violent Christian Identity organizations and

extremist members of the militia movement.

 

UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

 

 

 

that illegal immigrants were taking away American jobs through their willingness to

work at significantly lower wages. They also opposed free trade agreements, arguing that

these arrangements resulted in Americans losing jobs to countries such as Mexico.

(U//FOUO) Over the past five years, various rightwing extremists, including militias and

white supremacists, have adopted the immigration issue as a call to action, rallying point,

and recruiting tool. Debates over appropriate immigration levels and enforcement policy

generally fall within the realm of protected political speech under the First Amendment,

but in some cases, anti-immigration or strident pro-enforcement fervor has been directed

against specific groups and has the potential to turn violent.

(U//FOUO) DHS/I&A assesses that rightwing extremist groups’ frustration over a

perceived lack of government action on illegal immigration has the potential to incite

individuals or small groups toward violence. If such violence were to occur, it likely

would be isolated, small-scale, and directed at specific immigration-related targets.

— (U//FOUO) DHS/I&A notes that prominent civil rights organizations have

observed an increase in anti-Hispanic crimes over the past five years.

— (U) In April 2007, six militia members were arrested for various weapons and

explosives violations. Open source reporting alleged that those arrested had

discussed and conducted surveillance for a machinegun attack on Hispanics.

— (U) A militia member in Wyoming was arrested in February 2007 after

communicating his plans to travel to the Mexican border to kill immigrants

crossing into the United States 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(U) Perceived Threat from Rise of Other Countries(U//FOUO) Rightwing extremist paranoia of foreign regimes could escalate or beUNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYPage 7 of 9(U//FOUO) Lone Wolves and Small Terrorist Cells(U//FOUO) DHS/I&A assesses that lone wolves and (U) Current Economic and Political Climate(U//FOUO) DHS/I&A assesses that a number of economic and political factors are(U) Exploiting Economic Downturn(U//FOUO) Rightwing extremist chatter on the Internet continues to focus on the(U) Historical Presidential Election(U//LES) Rightwing extremists are harnessing this historical election as a recruitmentUNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYPage 4 of 9(U//FOUO) Perceptions on Poverty and Radicalizat(U//FOUO) Returning veterans possess combat skills and experience that areUNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYPage 3 of 9 (U//FOUO) Proposed imposition of firearms restrictions and weapons bans*(U) Rightwing extremism in the United States can be broadly divided into those groups, movements, and(U//FOUO) Growth of these groups subsided in reaction to increased(U//FOUO) During the 1990s, these issues contributed to the growth in the(U//LES) Rightwing extremists have capitalized on the election of the firstUNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYPage 2 of 9(U) Key Findings(U//LES) The DHS/Office of Intelligence and Analysis (I&A) has no specific* (U//LES) Threats from white supremacist and violent antigovernment groups

Top Democrat Hammers Homeland Security’s Napolitano; Cites Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Association

Top Democrat ‘dumbfounded’ by ‘extremism’ report

The top House Democrat overseeing the Department of Homeland Security is demanding that officials there explain how and why they wrote and released a controversial report identifying veterans as potential terrorist threats.

Rep. Bennie G. Thompson of Mississippi, chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, said in a letter to DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano that he was “dumbfounded” such a report would be issued.

“This report appears to raise significant issues involving the privacy and civil liberties of many Americans — including war veterans,” Mr. Thompson said in the letter sent Tuesday.

As I am certain you agree, freedom of association and freedom of speech are guaranteed to all Americans — whether a person’s beliefs, whatever their political orientation, are ‘extremist’ or not,” Mr. Thompson said.

The report “blurred the line,” and Mr. Thompson said he is “disappointed and surprised that the department would allow this report to be disseminated” to law enforcement officials nationwide.

Also Wednesday, Ms. Napolitano issued a statement standing by the report, which she personally had reviewed before it was issued.

The Washington Times reported Tuesday that the department’s Office of Intelligence and Analysis (I&A) released a report titled Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment on April 7. It identified as potential terrorist threats people who collect guns, veterans, supporters of border control, and pro-life advocates.

“I am particularly struck by the report’s conclusion which states that I&A ‘will be working with its state and local partners over the next several months to ascertain with greater regional specificity the rise in rightwing extremist activity in the United States with a particular emphasis on the political, economic, and social factors that drive rightwing extremist radicalization,'” Mr. Thompson said, demanding to know what types of activities DHS had planned for “the next several months.”

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/apr/15/top-dem-dumbfounded-extremism-report/

McAuleys World: Contact your Representatives In Washington and demand Napolitano’s resignation now: http://www.usa.gov/Contact.shtml

Homeland Security’s Napolitano Insults Veterans, Unions, Gun Owners and Pro-life

This is simply unbelievable.

Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano must resign.

First, the Secretary for Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano, order ICE (Immigration & Customs Enforcement) to stop workplace raids. Raids which located, identified and deported illegal aliens and provided operational intelligance which helped indentify the “trafficking” routes used by those who transport not just illegal aliens, but sex slaves, drugs, weapons and potential terrorists into the United States.

Then the good Secretary and the Obama Administration announced a change in the samatics of Obama Government Speak. The term “War on Terror” was abandoned for the term “Over Seas Contingency Operation”. In fact, Administration employees were instructed to discontinue using the terms “terror” or “terrorists” in public. This would appear to be just a matter of semantics, until now. Apparently the use of the term “Terror” and “terrorists” is being reserved for use in conjunction with “Right Wing Extremist”. A “Right Wing Extremist” is anyone who served in the US Military, believes in gun ownership rights, opposes abortion, opposes NAFTA or illegal immigration or believes in many of the other ‘Freedoms” guaranteed by the Constitution. Particluarly offensive is the continued reference to those that oppose abortion as being “White Supremacists”. In Napolitano’s world, if you believe “smaller government” is better than “bigger government” you are a right wing extremists.

A new report from Secretary Napolitano categorizes returning Military Veterans and those individuals that are proponents of “States Rights” or those that oppose the growth of the Federal Government as “Right Wing Extremists”. See the footnote at the end of page 2 of the report, “Rightwing extremism in the United States can be broadly divided into those groups, movements, and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups), and those that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely. It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration.
http://wnd.com/images/dhs-rightwing-extremism.pdf

As to Veternas and the Constitutional Right to bare arms the report also states, “The possible passage of new restrictions on firearms and the return of military veterans facing significant challenges reintegrating into their communities could lead to the potential emergence of terrorist groups or lone wolf extremists capable of carrying out violent attacks.” On page 2 of 9 of the report, just above the footnote. http://wnd.com/images/dhs-rightwing-extremism.pdf

Just what the heck is she talking about. Veterans have always faced “reintergration challenges” only someone that has never served would fail to grasp that fact. The Secretary of Homeland Security believes it is OK to cast this type of aspersion on the reputation of thoses that have sacrifriced for our Country. The defamation of returning American Service Personnel in this manner clearly exposes the disdain both Napolitano and the Obama Administration hold for our Troops. Wasn’t it just weeks ago that the Obama Adminstrationm proposed having the Troops pay for their service related medical care with private insurance? This is just another outshoot of the liberal anti-military philosophy so common in the 1970s.

Next the report states, “Returning veterans possess combat skills and experience that are attractive to rightwing extremists. DHS/I&A is concerned that rightwing extremists will attempt to recruit and radicalize returning veterans in order to
boost their violent capabilities.” At page 3 of 9. http://wnd.com/images/dhs-rightwing-extremism.pdf

The report goes on to say, “Disgruntled Military Veterans: assesses that rightwing extremists will attempt to recruit and
radicalize returning veterans in order to exploit their skills and knowledge derived from military training and combat. These skills and knowledge have the potential to boost the capabilities of extremists—including lone wolves or small terrorist cells—to carry out violence. The willingness of a small percentage of military personnel to join extremist groups during the 1990s because they were disgruntled, disillusioned, or suffering from the psychological effects of war is being replicated today.” “After Operation Desert Shield/Storm in 1990-1991, some returning military veterans—including Timothy McVeigh—joined or associated with rightwing extremist groups.” at page 8 of 10.

“A prominent civil rights organization reported in 2006 that “large numbers of potentially violent neo-Nazis, skinheads, and other white supremacists are now learning the art of warfare in the [U.S.] armed forces.” at page 8. What Civil Rights organization? ACORN?

Where is the proof? How dare Napolitano compare all US Mititary personnel to McVeigh.

Secretary Napolitano needs to resign today

Next the report turns to a favorite target of the “Left Wing Extermists” like Napolitano, legal gun ownership, when the report states, “Proposed imposition of firearms restrictions and weapons bans likely would attract new members into the ranks of rightwing extremist groups, as well as potentially spur some of them to begin planning and training for violence against the government. The high volume of purchases and stockpiling of weapons and ammunition by rightwing extremists in anticipation of restrictions and bans in some parts of the country continue to be a primary concern to law enforcement.” What law enforcement orgainzations are those? My local Sheriffs Department encourages citizens to legally own and register weapons.

Is Secretary Napolitano a facist. The Supreme Court of the United states has reconfirmed the right of Americans to own firearms.

Secretary Napolitano must resign.

“a number of economic and political factors are driving a resurgence in rightwing extremist recruitment and radicalization activity” …. “the threat posed by lone wolves and small terrorist cells is more pronounced than in past years.”

Is my local VFW meeting a “terrorist cell”? There are a lot of highly trained people in attendance, most own guns, slightly fewer attend church than own guns, I’d bet at least half oppose abortion. They all seem to be in favor of enforcing the immigration laws that are on the books. Somebody better call Homeland Security.

“Rightwing extremist chatter on the Internet continues to focus on the economy, the perceived loss of U.S. jobs in the manufacturing and construction sectors and home foreclosures.”

Oh my gosh, what does “perceived loss of U.S. jobs” mean. Isn’t the unemployment rate a shade below 9%. My liberal democratic friends are talking about the economy too ….. and how they will vote next time around if the Obama “plans” don’t work ….. are these long time Democrats on the verge of becoming “right wing extremists”. http://wnd.com/images/dhs-rightwing-extremism.pdf

“Many rightwing extremists are antagonistic toward the new presidential administration and its perceived stance on a range of issues, including immigration and citizenship, the expansion of social programs to minorities, and restrictions on firearms ownership and use.” http://wnd.com/images/dhs-rightwing-extremism.pdf

Apparently, anyone who has a different point of view than the Administration is an “extremist”.

Nazi Germany and the Gestapo come to mind …..

“Paralleling the current national climate, rightwing extremists during the 1990s exploited a variety of social issues and political themes to increase group visibility and recruit new members. Prominent among these themes were the militia movement’s opposition to gun control efforts, criticism of free trade agreements (particularly those with Mexico), and highlighting perceived government infringement on civil liberties as well as white supremacists’ longstanding exploitation of social issues such as abortion“. At page 5 of 10 – “Revisiting the 1990’s”. http://wnd.com/images/dhs-rightwing-extremism.pdf

Can you believe this, if you oppose unconsitutional gun control laws, if you are critical of NAFTA, if you are in favor of civil liberties, you are a “Right Wing Extremist”. If you are Pro-Life you are not only an extremist but a “white supremacist” as well. Wow, if you happen to be a Black Christian who opposes abortion, you now qualify as a “White Supremacist”. Only in America as scene through the eyes of the Obama Administration.

“Historically, domestic rightwing extremists have feared, predicted, and anticipated a cataclysmic economic collapse in the United States” … “These teachings also have been linked with the radicalization of domestic extremist individuals and groups in the past, such as violent Christian Identity organizations and extremist members of the militia movement.”

Wow, if you warn that historical precedent indicates that the Obama Economic Recovery plan will fail, if you warned that teh Housing Bubble, like the inetrnet bubble, would “pop”, you are an extremist and this qualifies you to become a member of a “violent Christian Identity organization” like the Klu-Klux-Klan. Never mind that thousands of Economists oppose the Obama Plans on non ideologic grounds, the plan is simply bad economics – but now those Economists are hateful, Right Wing Extremists who are on the verge of becoming domestic terrorists.

“Rightwing extremists were concerned during the 1990s with the perception that illegal immigrants were taking away American jobs through their willingness to work at significantly lower wages. They also opposed free trade agreements, arguing that these arrangements resulted in Americans losing jobs to countries such as Mexico.” At page 6 of 10.

In my circles, the individuals and Groups who spoke out the loudest on these topics were the Unions. Are those groups now “Right Wing Extremists”. What I find incredible is the fact that the author simply denies that the comments are, in fact, true. The presence of 20 million illegal immigrants in the US does act to lower wages in this Country. Manufacturing jobs have been lost to Mexico. Is opposition to NAFTA enough to make you a Right WIng extremist. I’m a conservative and to the “Right” of my friends in Union circles, are they suddenly the “Right Wing extremists?

“Over the past five years, various rightwing extremists, including militias and white supremacists, have adopted the immigration issue as a call to action, rallying point, and recruiting tool. Debates over appropriate immigration levels and enforcement policy generally fall within the realm of protected political speech under the First Amendment, but in some cases, anti-immigration or strident pro-enforcement fervor has been directed against specific groups and has the potential to turn violent.”

Wow, now law abiding American Citizens who call for the enforcement of existing immigration laws are “extremists” and “white supremacists”. Hispanic members of my Community and Church who share my views on immigration will be shocked by this claim. Are we about to become violent, Right Wing Extremists, who will act violently to promote White Supremacy. Terrorists one and all. Gee and I forgot, many of us are Pro-Life too. Call out the National Guard – opps – I suppose we have to watch the Guard too.

“Many rightwing extremist groups perceive recent gun control legislation as a threat to their right to bear arms and in response have increased weapons and ammunition stockpiling, as well as renewed participation in paramilitary training exercises.”

Exactly what gun control legislation are they talking about? This is simply left wing paranoia. Public support for additional gun control measures ia at it lowest levels in 50 years. At present, 66% of the country opposes proposed bans on hand gun ownership. Gee, this makes for a lot of potential terrorists doesn’t it. http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/04/08/gun.control.poll/

Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Belief, Freedom of Religion, Freedom to Bear Arms, is this the mantra of new “Terroistist”, is this the new “Terrorism” Homeland Security is guarding against.

“When governments fear the people there is liberty. When the people fear the government there is tyranny.” Thomas Jefferson. “The Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms.” Samuel Adams http://home.earthlink.net/~mmmhiggins/RightBareArms.html

House Republican Leader John Boehner issued this statement, “Washington, Apr 15 – House Republican Leader John Boehner (R-OH) issued the following statement on a Department of Homeland Security report that characterizes veterans returning home from Iraq and Afghanistan as vulnerable for recruitment into “terrorist groups”:“To characterize men and women returning home after defending our country as potential terrorists is offensive and unacceptable. The Department of Homeland Security owes our veterans an apology.“Furthermore, the Secretary of Homeland Security owes the American people an explanation for why she has abandoned using the term ‘terrorist’ to describe those, such as al Qaeda, who are plotting overseas to kill innocent Americans, while her own Department is using the same term to describe American citizens who disagree with the direction Washington Democrats are taking our nation. Everyone agrees that the Department should be focused on protecting America, but using such broad-based generalizations about the American people is simply outrageous.” http://republicanleader.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=122567

Contact Your Congressperson, your Representative and your Senators and tell them that Napolitano isn’t qualified to lead the Department of Homeland Security. Contact them today: http://www.usa.gov/Contact.shtml

 

UPDATE: Top House Democrat Hammers Napolitano:  https://mcauleysworld.wordpress.com/2009/04/17/top-democrat-hammers-homeland-securitys-napolitano-cites-freedom-of-speech-freedom-of-association/

%d bloggers like this: