A CAR CZAR – Big Surprise! Politicians Decide More Bureaucracy Is The Answer

“Car czar” proposed for any automaker bailout

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – A government “car czar” would oversee any bailout of U.S. automakers under proposed terms being negotiated by the White House and Congress.

‘CAR CZAR’ PROPOSAL

 One leadership aide said both sides favored creation of a “car czar” role within the executive branch to oversee funds and ensure conditions were met.

Senior lawmakers hope next week to present a proposal for votes in both the House of Representatives and the Senate where there has been widespread skepticism about a bailout.

The companies have said they would accept strict terms as conditions for aid. GM and Chrysler said they would go so far as to reconsider a merger if it meant getting federal funds. Congress is not expected to demand such a step this time.

THEN WHY NOT BRANKRUPTCY – THAT IS WHAT BANKRUPTCY IS DESIGNED TO DO? WHY CREATE A NEW “CZAR” AND SPEND TAX MONEY ON A NEW AGENCY?  

GM is expected to kick off a restructuring process that will resemble a bankruptcy proceeding but under the oversight of appointed officials rather than a federal judge.

EXACTLY WHY SHOULD WE CREATE THIS ADDITIONAL  BUREAUCRACY WHEN THE BANKRUPTCY SYSTEM WORKS FOR EVERY OTHER COMPANY AND INDIVIDUAL? IS THERE SOME HIDDEN AGENDA? 

The union, which has lost over a third of its membership this decade, has signaled that it will accept deep concessions now in a bid to save GM and Chrysler.

THIS IS SIMPLY NOT ACCURATE – THE UAW HAS ALSO SAID IT WILL MAKE NO FURTHER CONCESSIONS – EITHER WAY – A BANKRUPTCY JUDGE IS EMPOWERED, BY LAW, TO DIRECT ANY NECESSARY CONCESSIONS. LEGALLY, A “CZAR” DOES NOT HAVE THIS POWER.

$2.5 billion of GM’s market value could be wiped out for shareholders. The automaker is working to slash $30 billion in debt and could offer equity to existing creditors, including the United Auto Workers.Other conditions favored by many lawmakers included limiting executive compensation, imposing strict loan repayment terms, and protections for taxpayers that might include an equity stake in a restructured company.

THESE ARE THE EXACT TYPES OF ISSUES RESOLVED IN BAKRUPTCY COURTS EVRYDAY!  

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a California Democrat, said on Friday the Energy Department funds must be replenished within weeks of withdrawal.

Please! Repay the funds within weeks? Does anyone think that will happen?  How do you think the Detroit 3 will do that. What happens when the Detroit 3 continues to lose money and the taxpayors are not paid back? Don’t make a bad bet – Bankruptcy won’t cosdt the tax payors a dime and will acheive the desired result. 

A “CAR CZAR” – JUST LIKE THE “TARP” (Troubled Assest Relief Program for the Banks) provides no guarantee for taxpayers ……

CONTACT YOUR CONGRESSPERSON HERE: http://www.usa.gov/Contact/Elected.shtml

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: